<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Joey Mazzarelli</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joey.mazzarelli.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joey.mazzarelli.com</link>
	<description>Escalator Temporarily Stairs</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Easy Date parsing with JavaScript by John Lateral</title>
		<link>http://joey.mazzarelli.com/2008/11/25/easy-date-parsing-with-javascript/#comment-1175</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lateral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joey.mazzarelli.com/?p=80#comment-1175</guid>
		<description>Why is: 

MDY
12/50/2004

accepted as a valid date? The 50. december does not - as far as I know - exist in any normal calendar. Is it possible to have the function only accept VALID dates?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is: </p>
<p>MDY<br />
12/50/2004</p>
<p>accepted as a valid date? The 50. december does not - as far as I know - exist in any normal calendar. Is it possible to have the function only accept VALID dates?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Easy Date parsing with JavaScript by Joey</title>
		<link>http://joey.mazzarelli.com/2008/11/25/easy-date-parsing-with-javascript/#comment-1168</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joey.mazzarelli.com/?p=80#comment-1168</guid>
		<description>Bill,
Thanks, those are a couple more cases I can add to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill,<br />
Thanks, those are a couple more cases I can add to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Easy Date parsing with JavaScript by Bill</title>
		<link>http://joey.mazzarelli.com/2008/11/25/easy-date-parsing-with-javascript/#comment-1167</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joey.mazzarelli.com/?p=80#comment-1167</guid>
		<description>Here is a failure case that might be considered valid:

OPTIONS: MDY
INPUT: 02091972

If I put any kind of delimiter between 09 and 1972 (space, -, /) it parses (though not always correctly) 

If I put in a delimiter betwen 09 and 1972  (0209-1972) even with OPTIONS: MDY it parses as Nov 9, 1972 - the day part is ignored.

i figure if the string can be parsed and contains more than6 characters then all three portions to be parsed have been provided and should be parsed according to the OPTIONS value

In all of these examples "strict" is turned off</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a failure case that might be considered valid:</p>
<p>OPTIONS: MDY<br />
INPUT: 02091972</p>
<p>If I put any kind of delimiter between 09 and 1972 (space, -, /) it parses (though not always correctly) </p>
<p>If I put in a delimiter betwen 09 and 1972  (0209-1972) even with OPTIONS: MDY it parses as Nov 9, 1972 - the day part is ignored.</p>
<p>i figure if the string can be parsed and contains more than6 characters then all three portions to be parsed have been provided and should be parsed according to the OPTIONS value</p>
<p>In all of these examples &#8220;strict&#8221; is turned off</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Runtime PHP Annotations. What a tease. by Sven</title>
		<link>http://joey.mazzarelli.com/2008/05/30/runtime-php-annotations-what-a-tease/#comment-1118</link>
		<dc:creator>Sven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joey.mazzarelli.com/?p=19#comment-1118</guid>
		<description>Hi Joey,

hmm annotations are somewhat nice, but in php they come down to: search for secific annotation, replace by code, write down new .php-file..

a more programmatic approach (that's the way, php works...) is to use Zend_Cache_FrontEnd_Class.. or Function, whatever you want..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joey,</p>
<p>hmm annotations are somewhat nice, but in php they come down to: search for secific annotation, replace by code, write down new .php-file..</p>
<p>a more programmatic approach (that&#8217;s the way, php works&#8230;) is to use Zend_Cache_FrontEnd_Class.. or Function, whatever you want..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Runtime PHP Annotations. What a tease. by Emily</title>
		<link>http://joey.mazzarelli.com/2008/05/30/runtime-php-annotations-what-a-tease/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joey.mazzarelli.com/?p=19#comment-554</guid>
		<description>We are hiring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are hiring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Runtime PHP Annotations. What a tease. by Joey</title>
		<link>http://joey.mazzarelli.com/2008/05/30/runtime-php-annotations-what-a-tease/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 03:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joey.mazzarelli.com/?p=19#comment-284</guid>
		<description>Thanks, I'll have to check that out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, I&#8217;ll have to check that out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Runtime PHP Annotations. What a tease. by johno</title>
		<link>http://joey.mazzarelli.com/2008/05/30/runtime-php-annotations-what-a-tease/#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>johno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 21:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joey.mazzarelli.com/?p=19#comment-283</guid>
		<description>Hi!

if you need annotation support for PHP look at my Addendum library. http://code.google.com/p/addendum/

Well, but what you seem to lack is more AOP than annotations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!</p>
<p>if you need annotation support for PHP look at my Addendum library. <a href="http://code.google.com/p/addendum/" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/p/addendum/</a></p>
<p>Well, but what you seem to lack is more AOP than annotations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Runtime PHP Annotations. What a tease. by Joey</title>
		<link>http://joey.mazzarelli.com/2008/05/30/runtime-php-annotations-what-a-tease/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 17:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joey.mazzarelli.com/?p=19#comment-231</guid>
		<description>Bryan and I were talking about them, and I'm under the impression they fall more in the category of code generation tools.

Not having to compile your source code is one of the few remaining virtues of PHP development.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan and I were talking about them, and I&#8217;m under the impression they fall more in the category of code generation tools.</p>
<p>Not having to compile your source code is one of the few remaining virtues of PHP development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Runtime PHP Annotations. What a tease. by Glenn</title>
		<link>http://joey.mazzarelli.com/2008/05/30/runtime-php-annotations-what-a-tease/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 17:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joey.mazzarelli.com/?p=19#comment-230</guid>
		<description>Sounds like what you want could be classified as aspect-oriented programming. Have you looked for any PHP AOP projects? They're probably just as half-assed though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like what you want could be classified as aspect-oriented programming. Have you looked for any PHP AOP projects? They&#8217;re probably just as half-assed though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Runtime PHP Annotations. What a tease. by Dad</title>
		<link>http://joey.mazzarelli.com/2008/05/30/runtime-php-annotations-what-a-tease/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 16:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joey.mazzarelli.com/?p=19#comment-229</guid>
		<description>I agree with you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
